Insights - Design & Product

Why Did Medium Rebrand? Again?

We attempt to play detective and make a prediction, based on Medium’s history of frequent logo changes

Accepted wisdom says that companies should rebrand only when necessary, because brand identities, unlike advertising campaigns, serve as enduring markers of brand recognition.

“In the competitive world of look-alike products, a distinctive company logotype is one, if not the principal means of distinguishing one product from that of another.”

Paul Rand, who designed the current IBM logo in 1972

Other than reasons enforced by business events like mergers and acquisitions (as in the case of the Vi telecom identity recently), rebranding typically occur when either:

  • The company wants to call attention to a refreshed brand positioning
  • The company has simply outgrown an early identity as business operations scale (GoDaddy, Slack, AirBnB)

Which one was it in the case of Medium?

Of Revenue Models & Rebrands

Evan Williams, co-founder of Twitter and founder of pioneering blogging site Blogger, founded in 2012. From its founding to 2017, when the site finally settled on its current ‘metered subscription’ model, Medium has seen a series of business model pivots. And every pivot seem to be accompanied by a change in brand identity.

2012 to 2015

Medium launched initially as an invite-only site for a handful of high-quality publishers who were paid for the content they produced. No one knew quite what the revenue model was, perhaps not even the Medium team. In 2014, in its first monetisation attempt, Medium ran a series of paid posts for BMW in a collection called Re:Form. High quality content and monetisation via sponsored content are completely at odds with each other and sure enough, Williams shut down Re:Form in 2015.

“We also learned that high-quality posts do not automatically garner attention and audience commensurate with the effort of producing them. As a result, our payment model failed to support some really terrific contributors.”

Evan Williams, Founder, Medium, 2014

Through this period, Medium sported as its logo, a bold, black-and-white slab-serif ‘M’ based on the font Stag.

The logo that Medium launched with in 2012

2015 to 2017

In 2015, Medium decided to turn the focus back on creators and said they would share ad revenue with them – based on the somewhat baffling concept of ‘claps.’

“We are going to be exploring new ways for professional and independent content creators to connect with both brands and their readers”

Evan Williams, Founder, Medium, 2015

This new focus prompted a rebranding, with the old logo changing to a friendlier interpretation of ‘M’ developed by type designer Rod Cavazos of the foundry PSY/OPS.

“This simple geometric interpretation of the M felt fun — like a delightful game or a deeply satisfying puzzle.”

Erich Nagler, Art Director, Medium, 2015
The Medium logo launched in 2015

In April 2016, Medium announced new tools for publishers and member-supported publishing, allowing readers to support publications through paid memberships. But just a few months later, in January 2017, Medium decided to drop the advertising revenue model altogether!

“In building out our model, we realized we didn’t yet have the right solution to the big question of driving payment for quality content. The vast majority of articles, videos, and other content we all consume on a daily basis is paid for — directly or indirectly — by corporations who are funding it in order to advance their goals. And it is measured, amplified, and rewarded based on its ability to do that. Period. As a result, we get…well, what we get. And it’s getting worse.”

Evan Williams, Founder, Medium, 2017

In what feels like consistent behaviour, Medium launched a new logo, replacing the ‘friendly’ M with a new black and white symbol, created by San Francisco-based design and branding studio Manual, that was reminiscent of its original logo. This also seemed like an attempt to create a visual link to the black letter mastheads of publications like The New York Times. Interestingly this avatar was praised by the community who said that ‘Medium seems to have gotten over its teenage days.’

Williams finally settled for a freemium model, with users allowed to read a certain number of free articles, before a $5 monthly subscription kicked in. This model was launched in March 2017 and Medium has stuck to it since then.


Since Medium’s business model has seemed stable for the last three years (although financial data is not available publicly), yet another new logo announcement is a surprise. The official explanatory post from Medium is just corporate-speak and offers little in the way of explanation.

“While our mission remains the same, our publishing tools, reading platform, and content offering are ever-advancing to better serve this mission. As the world changes around us, we aim to create a more intentional and relational network of

Karen Tropen, VP Marketing, Medium

For the first time the new identity, created by renowned New York and San Francisco creative hotshop Collins, has done away with the ‘M’ all together and now sports a logo that is created by three elliptical shapes of varying widths.

The evolution of the Medium logo

Of course, the social media guns came out blazing against the new logo, but that is now almost to be expected. Respected tech journalist Casey Newton, however, may have hit the nail on the head.

More disconcerting perhaps, is the fact that a Twitter user pointed out the similarity between the new Medium logo and the logo for Beehome, an initiative by Ikea-supported research and design lab, Space10.

The THC Take

It is now a given that any rebrand will gleefully be trashed on social media, with opinions on either side. The similarity with the Beehome logo is unfortunate, but again, it is almost impossible to anticipate this, when working with simple, graphic shapes. The new Medium identity is undoubtedly a sophisticated solution. Few people spoke about the new, distinctive design language which is based on words and letters.

Medium’s new 404 error page

The only thing we don’t understand is why the rebrand was necessary in the first place – unless there is another business pivot in the offing. MediumStack anyone?


  1. The platform sucks frankly but lets not forget that they have more writers than any new newsletter platform. If the launch a good newsletter product, they cd easily kill off newbies like Substack

    1. Good product is key right, idk if they are capable of it. They were doing so well but seem a bit stuck of late

  2. With the current wave of newsletters, not surprising that medium will want to get in the game. I pay the subscroption but it is almost impossible to find or follow content

  3. Hahaha, good detective work THC. Not seen this analysis anywhere. People are only trolling logo design which matters squat in the long term

Leave a Comment

All comments are moderated according to our comment policy. Your email address will NOT be published. All fields are required.

The Hard Copy is a resource for building and growing modern brands. Sign up to get case studies and advice in your inbox every week.

Related Articles